CLICK HERE FOR THOUSANDS OF FREE BLOGGER TEMPLATES »

Monday, August 3, 2015

10-Eye-Opening Quotes From Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger

Opinion   Lauren Enriquez   Mar 11, 2013   |   4:50PM    Washington, DC



Margaret Sanger has been lauded by some as a woman of valor, but a closer look reveals that Planned Parenthood’s audacious founder had some unsavory things to say about matters of race, birth control, and abortion. An outspoken eugenicist herself, Sanger consistently promoted racist ideals with a contemptuous attitude.
margaretsanger4Read on to learn why Planned Parenthood hides behind a false memory of Sanger, and why, despite her extraordinarily prolific writing career, one rarely sees her quoted by Planned Parenthood leaders and apologists.
The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.
Woman and the New Race, ch. 6: “The Wickedness of Creating Large Families.” Here, Sanger argues that, because the conditions of large families tend to involve poverty and illness, it is better for everyone involved if a child’s life is snuffed out before he or she has a chance to pose difficulties to its family.
[We should] apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.
Plan for Peace” from Birth Control Review (April 1932, pp. 107-108)
Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.
Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…
Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.
“America Needs a Code for Babies,” 27 Mar 1934
Give dysgenic groups [people with “bad genes”] in our population their choice of segregation or [compulsory] sterilization.
April 1932 Birth Control Review, pg. 108
Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.
Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.
We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities.  The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.
Margaret Sanger’s December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts. Also described in Linda Gordon’s Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976.
A woman’s duty: To look the whole world in the face with a go-to-hell look in the eyes… to speak and act in defiance of convention.
The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1
[The most penetrating thinkers] are coming to see that a qualitative factor as opposed to a quantitative one is of primary importance in dealing with the great masses of humanity.
CLICK LIKE IF YOU’RE PRO-LIFE!


Pivot of Civilization, 1922. Here, Margaret Sanger speaks on her eugenic philosophy – that only the types of “quality” people she and her peers viewed as worthy of life should be allowed to live.
Such parents swell the pathetic ranks of the unemployed. Feeble-mindedness perpetuates itself from the ranks of those who are blandly indifferent to their racial responsibilities. And it is largely this type of humanity we are now drawing upon to populate our world for the generations to come. In this orgy of multiplying and replenishing the earth, this type is pari passu multiplying and perpetuating those direst evils in which we must, if civilization is to survive, extirpate by the very roots.
The Need for Birth Control in America (quoted by Angela Franks.)
Women of the working class, especially wage workers, should not have more than two children at most. The average working man can support no more and and the average working woman can take care of no more in decent fashion.
“Family Limitation,” eighth edition revised, 1918
LifeNews Note: Lauren is a Legislative Associate for Texas Right to Life and a graduate of Ave Maria University. This post originally appeared at Live Action News and is reprinted with permission.

EVERY CITY IN THE COUNTRY IS REDESIGNING ITS CITIES AROUND AN OBAMACARE DEATH PANEL MODEL.



For those of you who think I am harsh on the bike riders and go on to tell me that bicyclists have a right to be in the street, this is why I am opposed to all of this. This is an agenda. Just because the agenda has something you like doesn’t mean you support the agenda. You are giving in to what the system wants. It wants as little opposition as possible. They want as smooth a transition as possible into this nightmare. This is about changing lifestyles and they cannot do it if everyone is aware of it. Go look at the problems the city of Upland is having with its residents right now. It’s because they’ve figured it out
The thing about the progressives is that their agendas progress forever. If you leave a progressive agenda unchecked it will go father then you could ever possibly imagine. These bike lanes are a progressive agenda and if you support this then it will go farther and get more ridiculous then you could ever possible imagine.

  • Read more at http://investmentwatchblog.com/every-city-in-the-country-is-redesigning-its-cities-around-an-obamacare-death-panel-model/#ZER8wL7JPDzHJ1A0.99

Forced vaccinations part of HHS’s Healthy People 2020 ‘Decade of Vaccines’ agenda

We’re right smack-dab in the middle of the federal government’s “Decade of Vaccines” (2010-2020), and things couldn’t be moving any faster in the direction of total medical tyranny. California Governor Jerry Brown just signed into law SB 277 to force vaccines on nearly all school-age children; some members of Congress are now pushing for a national mandatory vaccination plan; and corporations and health groups all across the country are increasingly ostracizing employees and other individuals who refuse the jab.
So why all this sudden hysteria over vaccines? It’s all part of the Healthy People agenda first hatched by the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (ODPHP) back in the late 1970s, which paved the way for what we’re seeing today with the mad rush to make sure everyone’s vaccinated. Part of the plan is to corral the masses into accepting all government-approved vaccines as safe and effective medicine through manipulation and even force, which is quickly coming to pass.
Many of the stated goals of Healthy People were hard to come by in the earlier phases of the program prior to the advent of the Internet. But now that rapid communication is a standard way of life, the agenda is moving forward at breakneck speed as the powers that be orchestrate the full implementation of their “Decade of Vaccines,” which threatens every American with mandatory vaccine jabs.
“The latest recommendations (for Healthy People) are vast in scope and include government intrusion into nearly every conceivable area of personal life and health,” reports GreenMedInfo.com. “What started out as 15 topics and 226 objectives in 1990 has grown to 42 topics and more than 1,200 objectives for 2020.”
Among these topics and objectives are plans to advance vaccine research and development in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), meaning vaccine companies will join forces with these government agencies to fund more vaccine research. Vaccine companies are also demanding “guaranteed government financing, supply and distribution of vaccines.”
In addition to this forced use of taxpayer dollars to fund the development and sale of vaccines, the Decade of Vaccines is also focused on pushing more vaccine propaganda on both healthcare providers and consumers. Here are the five goals of the National Vaccine Implementation Plan, which was developed in conjunction with Healthy People:
1) Develop new and improved vaccines
2) Enhance the vaccine safety program
3) Support improved “communication” to enhance informed vaccine decision-making
4) Ensure a stable supply of, access to and better use of recommended vaccines
5) Increase global prevention through vaccines
The only way such goals can be achieved, of course, is through compulsion and the elimination of vaccine exemptions, which is what we’re currently seeing in the national debate. A report by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation entitled Outbreaks: Protecting Americans from Infectious Diseases admits this when it states that one of the ways to increase vaccination rates is to “minimize vaccine exemptions.”
“States should enact and enable universal childhood vaccinations except where immunization is medically contraindicated,” reads the report. “Non-medical vaccine exemptions, including personal belief exemptions, enable higher rates of exemptions in those states that allow them [implying religious and philosophical exemptions should not be allowed],” it adds, as covered by GreenMedInfo.com
So this is where we’re at: Governments are working overtime to eliminate vaccine exemptions at the same time as some 300 new vaccines are currently in the development pipeline. Can you see the writing on the wall and where things are headed?
Sources:
http://www.greenmedinfo.com
http://healthyamericans.org
http://www.truthwiki.org/Vaccine_Fanaticism
http://www.truthwiki.org/Medical_Fascism

Reprinted on RINF Alternative News with permission from Natural News.

TPP Ministerial Deadlock.”Good News for People on the Planet”. Worldwide Opposition to Trade Deal

Sunday, August 2, 2015

The Fall of Chicago. There Will Be No Economic Recovery.

    


MP3 Download: http://www.fdrpodcasts.com/#/3036/the…
Under a near crippling amount of debt and unfunded liabilities, Chicago lawmakers recently moved towards pension reform – but were denied by the courts who deemed the reforms to be in violation of the Illinois constitution.
On May 12nd, 2015, Moody’s Investors Service downgraded Chicago’s credit rating once again, which means that in less than two years Chicago’s credit rating has dropped seven notches under the rating agency. Moody’s also announced major downgrades for the Chicago Board of Education and the Chicago Park District debt – reducing the bonds to junk levels.
On July, 28th, 2015, Fitch Ratings followed by downgrading the Chicago Board of Education’s credit rating and also noted a negative outlook for the CPS which means that further downgrades are likely in the future.
Chicago joins Detroit in the illusive group of major cities with junk bond ratings from major institutions, which carries with it incredibly serous financial repercussions and increases the costs of borrowing.
The difference between the two cities is that Chicago’s debt and unfunded liabilities are more than three times higher than Detroit’s were when the city declared bankruptcy in 2013.
Chicago is unable to restructure its debt because the state does not allow municipalities to go bankrupt.
To put things in perspective: Every Chicago household is currently on the hook for at least $63,800 in local-government debt.
If things couldn’t possibly get any worse, the threat of another teachers strike is looming over the Chicago Public Schools with the expiration of the teachers’ union contract. Negotiations have not gone well.
Welcome to Chicago. There Will Be No Economic Recovery.
Sources: http://www.fdrurl.com/end-of-chicago

Read more at http://investmentwatchblog.com/the-fall-of-chicago-there-will-be-no-economic-recovery/#8rZcLq5pYPZ3CEiw.99

Third-term power grab for Barack Obama? Why not?!

Robert Bridge
Robert Bridge, originally from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, has worked as a journalist in Russia since 1998. His articles have appeared in a number of publications, including Russia in Global Affairs, The Drudge Report and Infowars.com. Formerly the editor-in-chief of The Moscow News, Bridge is the author of the book “Midnight in the American Empire”, which was released in early 2013.
U.S. President Barack Obama. © Jonathan Ernst
US President Obama, after congratulating himself this week as a “pretty good president,” expressed some bewilderment that the Constitution prevents him from running for a third term as supreme leader of the American superpower.
Addressing the African Union this week, the US Commander-in-Chief, jumping into costume as a champion of democracy, somberly acknowledged that “democratic progress is… at risk when leaders refuse to step aside when their terms end.” Then, in the very next line, he told the audience - still happily clapping the initial statement - a sucker punch by adding: “I do not understand this.”

As is usually the case when super-powerful people utter crazy, disturbing things, the audience responded with nothing more objectionable than confused, nervous laughter.

Perhaps most of us can agree that there is something at the very least strange, at worst, sinister, about a two-term president - and especially one who has never shown much respect for the sacred Constitution – cracking jokes over his desire to hold onto the reins of power for a third consecutive term.
Although the Democratic leader backpedalled on his remark, explaining that “under our Constitution, I cannot run again [chuckle, chuckle],” the last seven years of Obama’s reign of terror only invites the obvious question, “Why not?” Why shouldn’t Barack Obama - who has methodically droned foreign countries without the consent of Congress, spied on the American people without the consent of Congress, and militarized our local police forces with both the machinery and tactics of the US military without the consent of Congress - not go ahead and take the next logical step and make a historic power grab, Julius Caesar style?

We had a dream

Does anybody still remember how enthralled the world was at the prospect of an American leader coming to power who genuinely seemed intent on defending the interests of the downtrodden people, who had just been dragged through eight long years of George W. Bush’s war presidency?

To put the situation into its correct perspective, here is Drew Weston, professor of psychology at Emory University, describing the dark, desperate mood that had descended upon the nation around the time Obama was being sworn into office in January 2008.

“When Barack Obama rose to the lectern on Inauguration Day, the nation was in tatters. Americans were scared and angry. The economy was spinning in reverse. Three-quarters of a million people lost their jobs that month. Many had lost their homes, and with them the only nest eggs they had. Even the usually impervious upper middle class had seen a decade of stagnant or declining investment, with the stock market dropping in value with no end in sight. Hope was as scarce as credit.”
Weston provided various reasons as to why America’s first black leader failed to resolve the country’s most pressing issues, including his lack of solid political experience prior to being lifted into the presidency, a reluctance to take a firm stand against the “villains” who knowingly wrecked the global economy out of pure greed, and an unrealistic belief that conciliation with the take-no-prisoner Republicans was somehow an option.
Although I agree with Weston’s general argument that Obama’s presidency has been a dismal failure, the Democratic leader can’t be blamed for failing to do something that he never tried to do in the first place. If an Olympian athlete, for example, refuses to hurl the javelin when it’s his turn, we cannot say he failed. He simply declined to do what was expected of him, thus forfeiting his legacy, I would imagine, to the wrath of future historians (although considering that even George W. Bush is getting a decent press these days, Obama will probably come out smelling like roses).

In any case, what Obama has succeeded at doing as President is at complete odds with what he promised the American people: The guilty bankers are still roaming Wall Street like a pack of wolves with even more wealth than before the 2008 financial crash; the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, where over 100 prisoners - many of them innocent of the charges against them - is still open for business; a full frontal assault on the civil and constitutional rights of the American people; the egregious attack of sovereign states, namely Libya, without the consent of Congress.

Judging by the above ‘achievements’ it would be very difficult to distinguish between an Obama and a Bush (much like it will be nearly impossible to distinguish between the 2016 presidential candidates, most likely to be Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush). Indeed, through much of his two terms in office Obama has behaved more like a neoconservative than a Liberal. This should come as no surprise given that Washington has been practically hijacked by the military industrial lobby, which depends on the harvesting of war plunder for its survival.

Having landed his job on Pennsylvania Avenue on the promise of ending his  predecessor’s warmongering, Obama behaved no better when he ordered US military intervention in Libya without getting approval from Congress.

Here is how Obama told the US people that they would be getting knee-deep in the domestic disorder of yet another foreign country: “President Barack Obama hosted 18 senior lawmakers at the White House… to "consult" with them about the new plan to intervene in Libya, exactly 90 minutes before Obama announced that plan to the world and one day after his administration successfully pushed for authorization of military force at the United Nations,” as Foreign Policy magazine explained.

No public debate, no public discussion, no public democracy. No different at all from the Bush years. And just like that, Libya, formerly Africa’s most advanced country that had provided its citizens with a first-class medical and education system (thanks to its late leader Muammar Gaddafi, who was murdered like a dog on the street by a NATO-backed mob) joined Afghanistan and Iraq as the latest sovereign state to collapse under America’s diabolical ‘planting the seeds of democracy’ experiment.

Totally ignoring his empty promise of ‘Hope & Change,’ Obama gave the banking class a gentle slap on the wrist and sent them back to Wall Street to collect their yearly Christmas bonuses. Not a single financier responsible for shattering millions of American dreams spent a single day in a prison cell.

And while America was asleep on the couch, casually ignoring the undemocratic developments taking place with shocking regularity around the world, it didn’t notice that the menacing machine was returning home to settle other accounts.
Occupy Wall Street protesters © Brendan McDermid

Obama crosses the Rubicon

So, was it all just coincidence that at the very same time the Obama administration was giving Wall Street a ‘Get Out of Jail Free’ card, and the rabble of the Occupy Wall Street movement was gaining a head of steam, the Defense Department was dispatching millions of dollars’ worth of military equipment to local police forces around the country? In fact, as Newsweek reported, “America has been quietly arming its police for battle since the early 1990s.”

Although the excuse for turning local police forces into veritable armies was to battle against the drug lords from South America, recent events around the country, where the police are resorting to military-style techniques when dealing with the very citizens they are meant to protect, has exposed the lie.
Is it any wonder that an increasing number of unarmed suspects – many of them young and black - are being killed at the hands of these paramilitary outfits?
Essentially what has happened – intentionally or otherwise – is that the US government has found an ingenious way of skirting Posse Comitatus, an act that was signed in 1878 that is designed to limit the powers of the federal government in using the military to act as domestic law enforcement. Now that US police have many of the toys available to the US military, the Obama administration has found yet another way to ignore the law of the land.
Meanwhile, multiple government agencies have been on a bullet-buying spree.
As Infowars reported in April: “The Department of Homeland Security is set to purchase over 62 million rounds of ammo typically used in AR-15 semi-automatic rifles, just weeks after the ATF was forced to back down on a ban on M855 bullets.”
Finally, in what must certainly rank as a conspiracy theorist’s worst nightmare, the US military has just kicked off 'Jade Helm 15', a domestic military exercise that brings together over 1,000 members from the nation’s elite forces, including Green Berets, Special Ops from the Navy and Marines, and SEALS. The operation, which will take place across seven southwestern states, will give America's toughest soldiers an opportunity to practice “unconventional warfare.”
"They're going to set up cells of people and test how well they're able to move around without getting too noticed in the community," Roy Boyd, chief deputy with the Victoria County Sheriff's Office, told the Houston Chronicle. "They're testing their abilities to basically blend in with the local environment and not stand out and blow their cover."
U.S. Army Special Operations Command map, depicting the US military plans during the Jade Helm 15 exercise. © U.S. Army Special Operations Command
But the mystery surrounding Jade Helm 15, which takes as its motto, “Master the Human Domain,” promises to grow even more because the media – which has rode shotgun with the US military in the dangerous sands of Iraq and Afghanistan – will not be invited to report on these domestic military exercises (!).
“All requests from the media for interviews and coverage of US Army Special Operations Command personnel, organizations and events are assessed for feasibility and granted when and where possible,” Lt. Col. Mark Lastoria, a spokesman for Army Special Operations Command, Lastoria said in a statement given to The Washington Post. “We are dedicated to communicating with the public, while balancing that against the application of operations security and other factors.”

There was a strict rule in Roman times that said that no military commnader was permitted to enter the territory of the republic in the company of armed soldiers. There were some very good and obvious reasons for such a law. Thus, when Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon in defiance of Rome and Pompey, he uttered the famous words, “The die has been cast.”
Given the rather curious circumstances of the American people with regards to their increasingly imperial presidency, and the issues that it is creating for safeguarding civil liberties, not to mention the Constituion itself, it may be the right time to ask whether the proverbial die has been cast for them as well.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Robert Bridge is the author of the book, "Midnight in the American Empire," which documents the dangerous consequences of excessive corporate power in a democracy.

US President Barack Obama

US President Obama to Unveil Sweeping Climate Change Plan Monday

© AP Photo/ Jacquelyn Martin
World
Get short URL
6212833

White House announced that US President Barack Obama will release the final version of climate change regulation that seeks to adopt sweeping curbs on greenhouse gas pollution.

MOSCOW (Sputnik) US President Barack Obama will release the final version of climate change regulation that seeks to adopt sweeping curbs on greenhouse gas pollution, the White House announced Sunday.
“On Monday, my administration will release the final version of America’s Clean Power Plan, the biggest, most important step we’ve ever taken to combat climate change,” Obama said in a video announcement.
The plan is said to task power plants in the United States to adopt 32-percent cuts in carbon pollution from 2005 levels by 2030. The previous target was set at 30 percent.
In the announcement, Obama named power plants as the “single biggest source of the harmful carbon pollution that contributes to climate change.”
“But until now, there have been no federal limits to the amount of that pollution that those plants can dump into the air,” he added.
The final plan seeks to heavily regulate coal and other fossil fuel plants, seeking to shift the focus on renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power.
The US Environmental Protection Agency previously proposed similar regulations in 2012 and 2014.


Read more: http://sputniknews.com/world/20150802/1025313591.html#ixzz3hgdqHgmk


Note:  The asshole strikes again.